The film goes on to give a complete anatomical tour. Using close‑ups of children and adolescents of various ages, it explains:
The film is a product of its time, made at the beginning of the decade with an amateur crew and an all-amateur cast. It was produced by Studio Landstar Films, a production company that has no other known works. The cast included Hielde Daems and Willem Geyseghem, and the film was produced in the Dutch and Flemish languages. The film goes on to give a complete anatomical tour
For 1991, this was revolutionary. Most Western sex-ed films were either too clinical (dryly medical) or too euphemistic (avoiding direct terms like "penis" and "vagina"). Sexuele Voorlichting used proper anatomical terms without embarrassment. The cast included Hielde Daems and Willem Geyseghem,
The film also avoids scare tactics. It does not present sex as dangerous or shameful, but as a natural part of human life. This progressive, harm‑reduction approach was unusual for the early 1990s and remains influential in modern comprehensive sex education. but as an ongoing
: Consent is taught not just as a legal requirement, but as an ongoing, enthusiastic dialogue rooted in mutual respect.
Critics argue that such content crosses the line from education to exploitation. One IMDB reviewer wrote: “Whatever be the freedom extended to art forms, child nudity and child sex should not be allowed as a lucrative art. Let the children be children as immaculate lily. I have a strong apprehension that the under‑age actors in the documentary are victims of art.” Another commentator noted that the film “subtly exploits under‑age nudity and sex to earn the lot,” even while acknowledging its pedagogical aims.